I am about to take a very unpopular stance here and I understand if you want to throw rotten eggs, but I ask that you consider what I'm about to say with an open mind.
The front page of today's
Daily Sentinel proclaims: "No Smoking!" Yes, Nacogdoches has joined up with legions of smug urban areas everywhere and has just passed a ban on smoking in public places; and I kind of think that is wack. Yes, wack.
"Whaaa?" you're asking. "Aren't you a lifetime non-smoker who hates smoking, avoids smoky places, and bitterly moonlighted as a part-time chimney sweep in your last place of employment?"
Yes to all of those things. I don't think the smoking ban is wack because it inconveniences me or I will somehow not benefit from it. On the contrary, I shall be much less averse to a night at Flashback if I am unlikely to come home smelling like a sweaty bathroom where there IS poop on the floor. I shall no longer have to enjoy a side of filthy ash with my fries at a certain small burger place who will not get the benefit of publicity from me. I stand to win in every way. Go me!
So what's the downside? Well, as much as this will shock y'all that I'm admitting it: I'm not the boss of you. I also dislike anklets and toe rings a great deal. They offend me, but I wouldn't support a ban on them because of this. This is America where our entire ideology is or was once based on the tenet of "live and let live." Let people harm themselves--if they want to*, as long as they're not hurting you. But according to ever-more fantastic claims by non-smokers, they are being hurt.
According to these crusaders, smoking in public places is not just a matter of distaste for a bad habit, there's health on the line!
Think of the children! We're killing them! What about asthma and second-hand smoke as a death sentence? Whaaahhh! Booo! First of all, for anyone who has been paying attention, there is scads of reputable evidence that refutes the hyper claims of the EPA and others that second-hand smoke kills. (Google it, please.) Take
this article for example. Or
this one, which I have excerpted below.
Looking for a surer method of being ripped apart than entering a lion's den covered with catnip? Conduct the most exhaustive, longest-running study on second-hand smoke and death. Find no connection. Then rather than being PC and hiding your data in a vast warehouse next to the Ark of the Covenant, publish it in one of the world's most respected medical journals.
That's what research professor James Enstrom of UCLA and professor Geoffrey Kabat of the State University of New York, Stony Brook discovered last May. That's when they reported in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) that their 39-year study of 35,561 Californians who had never smoked showed no "causal relationship between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and tobacco-related mortality," adding, however "a small effect" can't be ruled out.Even removing health issues from the argument, there's a whole laundry list of items to consider in favor of instituting a smoking ban including an ACTUAL laundry list for those who wear dry-cleaning only items to bars. In fact,
this recent Daily Sentinel editorial boldly asserts that there's no reasonable argument for NOT instituting the smoking ban. "There's no arguing that point, no matter how inconvenient the truth."
WOW! Thank you, Al Gore. If you take the time to read that editorial, I hope you will consider how self-righteous, heavy-handed, and didactic it is. You can't argue! You can't dispute this iron-clad, rock-solid truth from the heavens, young person! Why then, do I bother arguing a point that is deemed inarguable, even when I stand to lose?
Because it is the right thing to do.
It is easy to feign courage by swimming downstream in the fast-moving river of public consciousness. Today's Sentinel photo showed a large number of attendees to last night's meeting. "Many wore buttons emblazoned with the symbol for 'no smoking,' and others clutched packets of notes and information." I don't mean to diminish the importance of participating in the community and being civic-minded, but are they serious? Good thing they all showed up to break up the deadlock of the UNANIMOUS vote. Dr. Kathryn Lewis added this gem to the meeting.
"Nacogdoches prides itself on being the oldest city in Texas," she said. "We need not be the last city in Texas who passes this ordinance to keep a smoke-free environment for our people to work, worship and play."What? Those two sentences are rather incongruous, but the clincher is the "worship and play" section of that quote. When was the last time you were in a church where someone was smoking? A school?
Oh, that's right: it's been like thirty years because schools and churches voluntarily banned smoking on their premises ages ago. And therein lies my argument about why I think this smoking ban is not the way and the light. The theory behind this smoking ban is that people will not choose to do something for the greater good unless you make them. And maybe that is true (though church and school district evidence would disagree!), but who are we to make them? This is America!
In my opinion, the market will eventually bear it all out. If restaurants, like the one mentioned in the Sentinel editorial, voluntarily institute a no smoking policy on their premises and do well because of it, won't that be a more powerful motivation for others to follow suite than MAKING them? Economic pressure is always the ultimate decider. Has anyone else paid one second of attention to the swelling tide of economics based on "greener living"?
This is not California, people. There is no explanation for that state. Legislation should not be passed because of fads. We can't laud ourselves for living in a free country if we start dictating what people can do in privately-owned establishments and OUTSIDE. "No touching the air within 20 feet of me."
I don't like smoking; I really don't. But this is not about smoking and if you close your eyes to this, what freedoms will you allow to be banned next? And after that?
*Yes, I am also a non-pot smoker, non-sex worker who support the legalization of marijuana and prostitution. I support all counties in Texas going wet, too and I am basically a non-drinker. How do you like that?
Now go forth and throw eggs at me.
Comment allez-vous?
Favorites Besides You
People!- Beyond the Bunion
- Cake Wrecks
- Confessions of a Pioneer Woman
- Future Jeopardy Champ
- Go Fug Yourself
- I'm Ready
- Mango Lassy
- The New Me
- Rule Brittaniea
- Stuff is Cool
- Time and Place
- Zay MoMo
- H-Town Bloggers
Stuff!Causes, Etc.
X-treme Archives
And Now This
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.